See into S60
» Subscribe
» Favorite Links
» What is S60?
» Freeware & Trials
» S60 devices
» Hints and tips

» About this blog
» 3rd party S60 applications (78)
» Devices (44)
» General (138)
» Internet stuff (13)
» Nokia Beta Labs (38)
» Nokia S60 applications (78)
» Tommi's Reports from Wonderland
» Voice of S60
» Creating Carbide C++
» S60 Multimedia Blog
» The Convergence Zone
» Web Browser for S60 Blog
» Consumed by S60
» Java for S60
» Mobile Web Server
» Mobile Security
» See into S60
» Business2GO
» Nokia Podcasting Application Blog
» Elvis has left the building (not really, but he's not updating this blog anymore)
» Current state and future of 2D barcodes
» Master's thesis at Beta Labs?
» Herding phenomenon in the web (or: pondering how to implement an effective feedback system for Beta Labs)
» Time to figure out a new box (and kick in the nuts everybody who says "web 2.0")
» July 2008
» January 2008
» December 2007
» November 2007
» October 2007
» September 2007
» August 2007
» July 2007
» June 2007
» May 2007
» April 2007
» March 2007
» February 2007
» January 2007
» December 2006
» November 2006
» October 2006
» September 2006
» August 2006
» July 2006
» June 2006
» May 2006
» April 2006
» March 2006
» February 2006
» January 2006
» December 2005
» November 2005
Subscribe
Links M
somerights20.png
March 26, 2007 Protos vs. production units: improved N95 camera quality Posted by Tommi at 09:12 AM | Categories: Devices

About a month ago, Stefan posted a provocative rant in Ring Nokia: Colors are off on the Nokia N95? Tests show the answer is undoubtedly yes. I looked at the pictures and agreed whole-heartedly. So I forwarded the link to the N95 team, and asked them to check it out. After listening the feedback carefully, they answered confidently that I shouldn't worry; it's just precommercial stuff.

Now, Nokia has started shipping the final products, and there has been a huge improvement in colors. Check the comparison and some example pictures that James Burland has posted in his The Creative Life Blog.

Moral of the story: let's remember that protos are, well, just protos.

Via Ring Nokia


Permalink |

Comments

Even know that's true, protos, are protos, it's good to know that you informed the right people about something in the blogosphere that caught your atention.

I think it's that kind of things that we nokia consumers/fans want from you. Bigger interaction!

Thanks Tommi.

Alexandre

Posted by: Alexandre Silva | March 26, 2007 11:48 AM

Yep, I agree, Alexandre.

I don't know did Stefan's feedback make a direct impact on N95 camera quality or not (e.g. by raising urgency inside Nokia to improve the color quality). But at least they listened, and took it under discussion.

In any case: big thanks, Stefan, for your post(s).

Posted by: Tommi Vilkamo | March 26, 2007 12:44 PM

I guess sending out Prototypes always has hidden dangers, but in many ways the onus is on us, the bloggers and testers, to make it very clear that we are dealing with preproduction models. Personally, I fell into that nasty trap with the whole N93i continuous auto-focus debacle, in my defence I was under the impression that the 93i unit that I had was a trial of the production version.

Anyway, great blog, and thanks for the mention!

Posted by: James @ The Creative Life | March 26, 2007 12:49 PM

Except resolution of camera Nokia N95 is not better than Nokia N73, in some conditions even worse (red and violet blur sometimes).
I'm not going to publish photo from prototype because they are bad. But in commercial version N95 is not so good unfortunately.

I do not understand why Nokia developers used algorithms which make more colours but less details on pictures. Check SE feature FixIt - the same result for picture but you original photo is saved on you mobile (with all details). Different philosophy but end user have alternative...

Posted by: Eldar Murtazin | March 26, 2007 12:59 PM

Eldar: I'm not convinced that the N73 has a better camera than the N95. But I do agree that some of the N95's post processing is a bit harsh.

Posted by: James @ The Creative Life | March 26, 2007 01:14 PM

Right, bigger resolution doesn't directly translate to better quality. There is so many factors involved: pre-processing, post-processing, camera mechanics, camera sensor etc.

That's a good point to raise again Tommi. Also we cannot always know which "proto features" are actually HW and which SW related. So professional sites that do photo comparison etc. features should patiently wait until sales HW _and_ SW.

That said, it's great that those comparison reviews etc. are available to conscious customers. Because more megapixels is not always better :)

Posted by: Jukka Eklund | March 26, 2007 09:29 PM

http://www.airfa.net
http://SEOmarket.info
http://www.jauditor.com
http://www.jauditor.com/JBoss303
http://www.avencom.com
http://www.aldleel.com
http://www.KSAsky.com
http://www.KSAsky.net
http://www.8amar.com
http://Afghanistan.airfa.net
http://Albania.airfa.net
http://Algeria.airfa.net
http://Andorra.airfa.net
http://Angola.airfa.net
http://Antigua-Deps.airfa.net
http://Argentina.airfa.net
http://Armenia.airfa.net
http://Australia.airfa.net
http://Austria.airfa.net
http://Azerbaijan.airfa.net
http://Bahamas.airfa.net
http://Bahrain.airfa.net
http://Bangladesh.airfa.net
http://Barbados.airfa.net
http://Belarus.airfa.net
http://Belgium.airfa.net
http://Belize.airfa.net
http://Benin.airfa.net
http://Bhutan.airfa.net
http://Bolivia.airfa.net
http://Bosnia-Herzegovina.airfa.net
http://Botswana.airfa.net
http://Brazil.airfa.net
http://Brunei.airfa.net
http://Bulgaria.airfa.net
http://Burkina.airfa.net
http://Burundi.airfa.net
http://Cambodia.airfa.net
http://Cameroon.airfa.net
http://Canada.airfa.net
http://Cape-Verdi.airfa.net
http://Central-African-Rep.airfa.net
http://Chad.airfa.net
http://Chile.airfa.net
http://China.airfa.net
http://Colombia.airfa.net
http://Comoros.airfa.net
http://Congo.airfa.net
http://Congo.airfa.net
http://Costa-Rica.airfa.net
http://Croatia.airfa.net
http://Cuba.airfa.net
http://Cyprus.airfa.net
http://Czech-Republic.airfa.net
http://Denmark.airfa.net
http://Djibouti.airfa.net
http://Dominica.airfa.net
http://Dominican-Republic.airfa.net
http://East-Timor.airfa.net
http://Ecuador.airfa.net
http://Egypt.airfa.net
http://El-Salvador.airfa.net
http://Equatorial-Guinea.airfa.net
http://Eritrea.airfa.net
http://Estonia.airfa.net
http://Ethiopia.airfa.net
http://Fiji.airfa.net
http://Finland.airfa.net
http://France.airfa.net
http://Gabon.airfa.net
http://Gambia.airfa.net
http://Georgia.airfa.net
http://Germany.airfa.net
http://Ghana.airfa.net
http://Greece.airfa.net
http://Grenada.airfa.net
http://Guatemala.airfa.net
http://Guinea.airfa.net
http://Guinea-Bissau.airfa.net
http://Guyana.airfa.net
http://Haiti.airfa.net
http://Honduras.airfa.net
http://Hungary.airfa.net
http://Iceland.airfa.net
http://India.airfa.net
http://Indonesia.airfa.net
http://Iran.airfa.net
http://Iraq.airfa.net
http://Ireland.airfa.net
http://Israel.airfa.net
http://Italy.airfa.net
http://Ivory-Coast.airfa.net
http://Jamaica.airfa.net
http://Japan.airfa.net
http://Jordan.airfa.net
http://Kazakhstan.airfa.net
http://Kenya.airfa.net
http://Kiribati.airfa.net
http://Korea-North.airfa.net
http://Korea-South.airfa.net
http://Kuwait.airfa.net
http://Kyrgyzstan.airfa.net
http://Laos.airfa.net
http://Latvia.airfa.net
http://Lebanon.airfa.net
http://Lesotho.airfa.net
http://Liberia.airfa.net
http://Libya.airfa.net
http://Liechtenstein.airfa.net
http://Lithuania.airfa.net
http://Luxembourg.airfa.net
http://Macedonia.airfa.net
http://Madagascar.airfa.net
http://Malawi.airfa.net
http://Malaysia.airfa.net
http://Maldives.airfa.net
http://Mali.airfa.net
http://Malta.airfa.net
http://Marshall-Islands.airfa.net
http://Mauritania.airfa.net
http://Mauritius.airfa.net
http://Mexico.airfa.net
http://Micronesia.airfa.net
http://Moldova.airfa.net
http://Monaco.airfa.net
http://Mongolia.airfa.net
http://Morocco.airfa.net
http://Mozambique.airfa.net
http://Myanmar-Burma.airfa.net
http://Namibia.airfa.net
http://Nauru.airfa.net
http://Nepal.airfa.net
http://Netherlands.airfa.net
http://New-Zealand.airfa.net
http://Nicaragua.airfa.net
http://Niger.airfa.net
http://Nigeria.airfa.net
http://Norway.airfa.net
http://Oman.airfa.net
http://Pakistan.airfa.net
http://Palau.airfa.net
http://Panama.airfa.net
http://Papua-New-Guinea.airfa.net
http://Paraguay.airfa.net
http://Peru.airfa.net
http://Philippines.airfa.net
http://Poland.airfa.net
http://Portugal.airfa.net
http://Qatar.airfa.net
http://Romania.airfa.net
http://Russian-Federation.airfa.net
http://Rwanda.airfa.net
http://St-Kitts-Nevis.airfa.net
http://St-Lucia.airfa.net
http://St-Vincent-Gr-dines.airfa.net
http://San-Marino.airfa.net
http://Sao-Tome-Principe.airfa.net
http://Saudi-Arabia.airfa.net
http://Senegal.airfa.net
http://Seychelles.airfa.net
http://Sierra-Leone.airfa.net
http://Singapore.airfa.net
http://Slovakia.airfa.net
http://Slovenia.airfa.net
http://Solomon-Islands.airfa.net
http://Somalia.airfa.net
http://South-Africa.airfa.net
http://Spain.airfa.net
http://Sri-Lanka.airfa.net
http://Sudan.airfa.net
http://Suriname.airfa.net
http://Swaziland.airfa.net
http://Sweden.airfa.net
http://Switzerland.airfa.net
http://Syria.airfa.net
http://Taiwan.airfa.net
http://Tajikistan.airfa.net
http://Tanzania.airfa.net
http://Thailand.airfa.net
http://Togo.airfa.net
http://Tonga.airfa.net
http://Trinidad-Tobago.airfa.net
http://Tunisia.airfa.net
http://Turkey.airfa.net
http://Turkmenistan.airfa.net
http://Tuvalu.airfa.net
http://Uganda.airfa.net
http://Ukraine.airfa.net
http://United-Arab-Emirates.airfa.net
http://United-Kingdom.airfa.net
http://United-States.airfa.net
http://Uruguay.airfa.net
http://Uzbekistan.airfa.net
http://Vanuatu.airfa.net
http://Vatican-City.airfa.net
http://Venezuela.airfa.net
http://Vietnam.airfa.net
http://Western-Samoa.airfa.net
http://Yemen.airfa.net
http://Yugoslavia.airfa.net
http://Zambia.airfa.net
http://Zimbabwe.airfa.net

Posted by: airfa.net | May 22, 2008 05:08 AM


Post a comment







«Back to previous page