|
» Subscribe » Favorite Links » What is S60? » Freeware & Trials » S60 devices » Hints and tips » About this blog |
» Application development (24) » Applications (36) » Devices (21) » Games (7) » General (40) » Imaging (9) » Music (17) » Python (3) » Video (40) |
|
» New Mobile TV Receiver Accessory » Video Podcast Roundup to watch on Nseries » And the TIPA goes to... » Top Classic Smartphones » GPS Location Tagging Integrated into the Camera |
|
Subscribe RSS 2.0 feed |
Subscribe Atom feed If you wish to receive email notification, please here » |
|
Kevin's Jaiku Badge |
|
Carol's Jaiku Badge |
« New #1 in 3D: Nokia N95 | Main | Nokia Video Manager available for download »
In a surprising but very cool move Forum Nokia has added the actual CPU specifications for many of the Nokia S60 devices into their pages.
Some picks, here Nokia N95:
Dual CPU
CPU Type: ARM 11
CPU Clock Rate: 332 MHz
3D Graphics HW Accelerator
So we've got not one but 2 CPUs in there. The specs are for the one that is running all the applications. The other runs the "phone" stuff. In addition there is a 3D graphics accelerator mentioned, which we saw in action in my previous post. Smartphones are becoming more like computers in the sense that they might have a number of dedicated co-processors for certain tasks like 3D, audio, video etc.
Specs for the recently announced Nokia 5700 XpressMusic:
Single CPU
CPU Type: ARM 11
CPU Clock Rate: 369 MHz
So there we have just one CPU running all things ie. the phone stuff and the applications. As announced in Nokia material Nokia 5700 also has a 'dedicated audio chip for enhanced music performance'. I don't know why it's not mentioned here, might be that it's not relevant for developers.
And the (geekish) fun doesn't end here: FN also lists things like free RAM, type(s) of RAM memory installed, specs for camera(s), display etc. And of course all the standards supported. Flash Lite now has its own row also!
Here is the starting page:
http://forum.nokia.com/devices/matrix_all_1.html
BTW, if you have feedback for Forum Nokia team about the technical specifications I will collect it from the comments and send to the people involved.
Update: also check out the announcement in Forum Nokia Blogs.
-Jukka
Comments
I would like to know the exact processor inside. For example: The Nokia N95 has the TI OMAP 2420.
The 6290 is using a Freescale solution, but we don't know which chip it is.
Someone edited the 6290 wikipedia entry to remove the Freescale reference.
Before: http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:fNndpIiVTzoJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_6290+nokia+6290+FREESCALE&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-a
After: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_6290
Posted by: Stefan Constantinescu | April 1, 2007 03:09 PMWhaat! Finally we're getting the info we've been waiting for years. Now if only the specs for the older devices would be updated to include this information too (at least the memory available).
It's kinda sad, really, that there's still only 64MB of RAM in the devices and even more sad when you see that only 18MB of it is usable in applications (the 5700). 72% of memory taken by the OS? Doesn't seem right. Wonder how that'll be enough for even taking pictures when N93 complains all the time about running out of memory and it should have even more available...
At least E90 has 128MB memory and 80MB available. Maybe we're getting somewhere someday.
Posted by: Symbiatch | April 2, 2007 03:27 AMNote that on devices using NAND flash technology for ROM, the code needs to be loaded into RAM for execution (NOR type flash ROM supports, so called, eXecute In-Place or XIP where that is not necessary, and the device thus do not necessarily require as much dynamic RAM to be available).
Posted by: petrib | April 2, 2007 11:46 AMCheck out N76!
Is it the first N-series phone with 96MB RAM on-board?
Posted by: Ubik | April 2, 2007 12:23 PMUbik, looks like that!
Posted by: Jukka Eklund | April 3, 2007 02:06 AMpetrib: Usually the size of the app is not that important but if I only have a couple of megs available for all my apps to use, it's quite sad. The apps need working space to do what they're supposed to do. We've all seen how apps disappear from the background when using others, even if we can't understand how they could take up all the memory.
I personally have been quite upset with this, since SW makers do what Symbian Signed wants (the app must close if it's asked to do so) and many downloads, IM connections etc have been closed just because I've checked my emails at the same time, or even worse: taken a picture! This is not acceptable at all. And more RAM available for the apps would fix this immediately.
Posted by: Symbiatch | April 3, 2007 03:16 AMDemand paging in Symbian OS 9.5 (whenever it gets to S60 and actual devices) will also help, I imagine. Time will tell.
Posted by: petrib | April 3, 2007 01:08 PMStefan, that information is confidential.. What would do with the information? For application developers it's enough to know type (ARM11) and possibly clock speed.
Posted by: Jukka Eklund | April 5, 2007 09:49 AM