Developing on S60

Developers of S60

Old School: Legacy SDKs and Carbide

Carbide C++ - August 6th, 2008 - Written by Matt Pinsonneault

I know there are people out there developing for somewhat elderly devices, and I still get regular questions from users who download Carbide.c++ v1.3 and are unpleasantly surprised when they try to write the ultimate Series 60 2nd Edition application and Carbide refuses to oblige.

To accommodate folks using older kits, we have put Carbide.c++ v1.2 back up for download. It can be found here.

Note that no active development is being done on Carbide v1.2; we simply provide it as a service to people who need it to develop for older kits.

About the author Matt Pinsonneault

I've been doing developer support for Carbide.c++ (and CodeWarrior for Symbian OS before that) as long as those tools have existed. In my spare [..]

  • Number of posts: 13

Comments(3)

  1. Kiran10182 wrote

    As far as i know, support for S60 2nd edition SDKs is still there in Carbide.c++ 1.3. It is just not set as “ON” by default, hence it is not available in new project wizard. Through some hacks, one can turn it on to work with S60 2nd edition SDKs in Carbide.c++ 1.3.

    My question is, then what is the significance of “not” providing S60 2nd edition SDKs support by-default in Carbide.c++ 1.3?

    Thanks,
    Kiran.

  2. Matt Pinsonneault wrote

    > My question is, then what is the significance of “not” providing S60 2nd edition SDKs support
    > by-default in Carbide.c++ 1.3?

    Basically, it means we did no testing to ensure compatibility with older kits and provide no guarantees that it will work. If anyone reports problems using Carbide v1.3 or newer with unsupported kits our answer will be that they need to use v1.2 for development with those kits, since that is the last version that went through a full test cycle with legacy SDKs.

  3. Kiran10182 wrote

    Thanks for the reply Matt. I got the point now.

    Kiran.

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.